Thursday, January 29, 2009

Inauguration

I was browsing Google images for shots of the inauguration, and on the third page came up with the image below:



Here's the source:

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200802/r223675_883677.jpg

Now, to insert an image using Blogger, have open the page with the link's URL. You open your compose window, click on the window, and follow instructions.

To create a link using Blogger, click on the link icon. Note that in order for anything to appear in the link, you need to insert the text to be highlighted between the angle brackets.

I like this image--though it's not of the inauguration--because Obama seems to be reaching out of the screen to shake my hand.

Note that to form paragraphs, you need to hit enter/return two times.

You see from the way this looks that I saved too large an image . . . So I saved the image and used Photoshop to reduce it.



When you upload an image, Blogger puts it at the start of your compose window, so you might have to move it around.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Patagonia calling

I've just begun to re-read a novel I last read 10 years ago, Red Earth and Pouring Rain by the Indian / American writer Vikram Chandra, which opens in spectacular form when a disaffected young man returns to India and shoots a white-faced monkey that has carried off his jeans. The family bring the monkey inside, fearing a riot by followers of Hanuman, the monkey-god, and while being nursed, the monkey comes to self-consciousness as a reincarnation of Sanjay, a man who'd died a century previously. He begins to communicate with the family through a typewriter when Yama, the god of death, comes to capture him with a silken noose.


with the last of my strength, I rolled out of the bed and onto the floor and quickly dragged myself into the dark recesses underneath it. I lay there panting, watching Yama's gigantic gold-sandalled feet move closer to the bed to stand firm and immovable as pillars beside it; then, then a slim silver noose--so toy-like, you would think, so harmless--appeared to arc and weave like a living thing, nosing around under the bed, darting, snapping from side to side, seeking me, drawing closer, closer. . . . The noose is silver and soft, seductive in its silkiness, it comes to you gentle and pleasing like a lover . . .

Shortly after beginning this epic novel, I ran across an interview in Harper's for April with the Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges [that's Hor-gay Loo-ees Bor-hays] which also touches on the topic of transmigration of souls.
For me death is a hope, the irrational certitude of being abolished, erased, and forgotten. When I'm sad, I think, What does it matter what happens to a twentieth-century South American writer? What do I have to do with all of this? . . . I hope to be totally forgotten. I believe that this is death. Yet perhaps I'm wrong, and what follows is another life on another plane, no less interesting than this one, and I will accept that life too, just as I have accepted this one. But being younger, I would prefer not to remember this one in the other.


Images of death are so common in literature and in life, and yet we spend so much of our energy repressing our knowledge that some day it will be our turn. But I've sometimes thought of it as being elsewhere. Say, Patagonia. So far as I know or intend, I will never travel there--not that I have anything in particular against the extreme southern part of South America. There's just nothing to connect me with it or anyone who is there. Someone dies, and they are just incommunicado, off to Patagonia, and they won't call home though perhaps we live in the hope that they might.

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

What do you conclude when suddenly . . .

. . . several news sources are telling the same story, dropping in the same keywords, etc.? Kevin Drum observes this happening as we approach the announced date of the report on President Bush's Surge:

One way you can tell when a PR campaign is gearing up is the sudden appearance of a raft of articles all telling a remarkably similar story. So here's the remarkably similar story that's suddenly popping up everywhere regarding the surge: Sure, there might not be any political progress in Baghdad, but there's been lots of progress at the local level and that's what really matters. . . .

[J]ust be aware that this is apparently the new talking point: national reconciliation doesn't matter anymore. Tribal reconciliation is where the action is. We'll let you know how it's going six months from now.


Talking points are most easily recognized by the repetition of key phrases, which is a key technique of managing the news: political and other public figures offer repetition of phrases which are keys to a wider conceptual frame ("Support the troops"--this invokes patriotism and identifies how we feel about our soldiers with continued funding the war). So how do we distinguish between the same realization which is dawning on several people independently from the circulation of talking points from a central (propagandistic) source? That's the challenge of trying to pull back the curtain to see who is pulling the levers. Another key: who benefits?

Thursday, August 30, 2007

New class on propaganda

Fair's fair. If I'm asking students to keep a blog, I should reactivate my own.

I'll be posting comments and reflections here, as well as links to items of interest. A couple of the latter for now:

1. One of the continuing themes of the present administration is the habit of softening reports so that they are less critical of what is happening. A column in the Aug. 30 Washington Post offers yet another example. After the controversial 2000 Florida recount, Congress established an Election Assistance Commission to look into what went wrong--specifically, into charges of election tampering, attempts to suppress turnout, and voter fraud. (The first two have been used recently to benefit Republican candidates, the latter a counter-charge against Democrats.) A bipartisan report was produced, and then its conclusions neutered by the White House. (Report here.)

Keep in mind that, as with all such articles, the author is an interested party, and you should check out her facts.

2. As for resources, one that can help with finding out the source of PR information is SourceWatch. Maintained by the Center on Media and Democracy, its intent is to make information available about those behind PR efforts.

New class on propaganda

Fair's fair. If I'm asking students to keep a blog, I should reactivate my own.

I'll be posting comments and reflections here, as well as links to items of interest. A couple of the latter for now:

1. One of the continuing themes of the present administration is the habit of softening reports so that they are less critical of what is happening. A column in the Aug. 30 Washington Post offers yet another example. After the controversial 2000 Florida recount, Congress established an Election Assistance Commission to look into what went wrong--specifically, into charges of election tampering, attempts to suppress turnout, and voter fraud. (The first two have been used recently to benefit Republican candidates, the latter a counter-charge against Democrats.) A bipartisan report was produced, and then its conclusions neutered by the White House. (http://www.blogger.com/img/gl.link.gifReport here.)

Keep in mind that, as with all such articles, the author is an interested party, and you should check out her facts.

2. As for resources, one that can help with finding out the source of PR information is SourceWatch. Maintained by the Center on Media and Democracy, its intent is to make information available about those behind PR efforts.